That's more like it. Thanks to numberFire Premium Section for full betting lines action and game odds in addition to the stats-filled knowledge we're dropping below.
Game 2: Milwaukee Bucks at Miami Heat
Most Likely Result: Miami Heat in 5
| 4 Games | 5 Games | 6 Games | 7 Games | Total Win Odds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Miami | 32.27% | 34.45% | 17.21% | 10.52% | 94.45% |
| Milwaukee | 0.00% | 0.64% | 2.08% | 2.84% | 5.56% |
Stat to Know: Free Throw Factor
Holy cow the Bucks had a ton of problems in Game 1. They couldn't shoot (.457 effective field goal percentage), they couldn't stop Milwaukee from shooting (.610 eFG%), and they gave up 12.2 percent more offensive rebounds than they collected. But the Bucks finished game one with a key problem that if they don't correct it, they won't win a single game: you can NOT send Miami to the free throw line as often as they did.
Miami finished Game 1 with a free throw factor (FT/FGA) of .397. That means that for roughly every five shots that the Heat attempted, the Bucks allowed them to make two free throws. That's almost double the proportion that Milwaukee allowed during the regular season (No. 15 in the NBA), and it's .175 more than Miami averaged during the regular season (No. 6 in the NBA).
Miami's didn't even shoot particularly well from the charity stripe, shooting an 81.8 percent free throw rate on the game. They just attacked the paint with reckless abandonment and forced Milwaukee to foul them. 14 of Milwaukee's 23 fouls were in the act of shooting, and 18 of their 21 defensive fouls resulted in Miami free throws. That just can't happen if you're trying to upset the East's No. 1 seed.
Game 2: Boston Celtics at New York Knicks
Most Likely Result: New York Knicks in 5
| 4 Games | 5 Games | 6 Games | 7 Games | Total Win Odds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York | 18.43% | 27.61% | 18.87% | 16.89% | 81.82% |
| Boston | 0.00% | 2.44% | 7.50% | 8.26% | 18.18% |
Stat to Know: The Turnover Battle
In Game 1, the Celtics finished with a better free throw factor, comparable effective field goal percentage, and offensive rebound rate... well, you knew they weren't going to win that one. That meant the deciding Four Factors category was turnover rate. And unfortunately for Boston, they got absolutely murdered in that category.
Of the five Celtics starters, four finished Game 1 with a turnover rate of at least 20 percent of their personal possessions. Only Brandon Bass was able to keep the ball in his hands. When Carmelo Anthony and his 1.1 percent regular season steal rate is finishing with four swipes, it's probably not a good thing.
For Boston, though, the turnover rate should regress to the mean. Avery Bradley is the only one of Boston's five starters to have averaged a turnover on over 15 percent of possessions this year, and Bradley's only at 18.8 percent. The Celtics may be 23rd in season turnover rate, but Rajon Rondo's 22.6 percent turnover rate went a long way towards that figure. They should be fine offensively.
Winning the turnover battle may be a different story, though. The Knicks' 13.2 percent turnover rate in Game 1 was actually above their NBA-best 11.7 percent regular season rate. Boston, meanwhile, finished only No. 11 in the NBA at forcing turnovers at a 14.2 percent clip. If turnover rate is indeed the deciding factor, Boston could still be in trouble, even if a repeat of Game 1 doesn't occur.
Game 2: Golden State Warriors at Denver Nuggets
(3) Denver Nuggets vs. (6) Golden State Warriors
Most Likely Result: Denver Nuggets in 5
| 4 Games | 5 Games | 6 Games | 7 Games | Total Win Odds | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Denver | 20.49% | 31.80% | 18.42% | 15.60% | 86.30% |
| Golden State | 0.00% | 1.79% | 5.58% | 6.32% | 13.70% |
Stat to Know: Offensive Rebounding Percentage
I covered the effect of David Lee's loss this morning in detail, but there's one stat that I'm extremely excited to see today: who's going to dominate the offensive boards?
In game one, Golden State held a substantial edge on the offensive boards, collecting 25.5 percent of available rebounds on their end while Denver could only collect 14.3 percent of available offensive rebounds on their own end. Even though it was the only one of the Four Factors categories that Golden State won, as Denver took down eFG%, TOV%, and free throw factor, the 11 percent disparity was almost enough for Golden State to win the game.
Strangely enough, it's not the Golden State number that I expect to change in Game 2. Golden State's ORB% almost perfectly matched their 25.4 percent season average, and Carl Landry was actually a better offensive rebounder than Lee in both Game 1 (by 1.4 percent) and the regular season (by 2.4 percent).
It was the defensive end where Golden State held the advantage with Lee, though, bolstered by his 40.6 percent defensive rebound rate in Game 1. With that gone, and Kenneth Faried's 13.2 percent offensive rebound rate set to return, it would be a surprise to see Denver take this category back over. They did lead the NBA during the regular season with a 31.4 percent offensive rebound rate, after all. And if that happens, the Warriors will need to find another crack in the armor of the Denver Nuggets.