Kickers don't matter, except they do.
However you feel about the position in the NFL, the truth is, kickers are consistently placed in high-leverage situations throughout a game. They can help a team win contests, and they certainly can do the opposite, too.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers fans know what I'm talking about.
On the year, rookie kicker Roberto Aguayo has cost the Buccaneers 7.75 points. That's according to our Wil Lutz actually has a -4.25 Field Goal NEP total, just 3.5 expected points better than Bucs' kicker.
But the true separation at kicker this season has come at the top, where Justin Tucker is straight balling out. Take a look at the separation in Field Goal NEP between Tucker and the rest of the top-10 kickers this year:
| Kicker | Field Goal NEP |
|---|---|
| Justin Tucker | 40.43 |
| Adam Vinatieri | 17.01 |
| Matt Bryant | 14.39 |
| Phil Dawson | 13.95 |
| Ryan Succop | 12.02 |
| Cairo Santos | 11.91 |
| Matt Prater | 11.52 |
| Jason Myers | 10.23 |
| Dan Bailey | 9.04 |
| Josh Lambo | 8.76 |
Let's put this into perspective for a second.
The average kicker this year is adding 0.29 expected points per field goal attempt. Considering Tucker has tried 27 field goals, an average NFL kicker on the Ravens would have a 7.83 Field Goal NEP.
In other words, Justin Tucker is currently 32.60 expected points better than that, which equates to 2.96 points per game.
Guys, Justin Tucker is essentially adding an additional field goal for the Ravens versus expectation per game this year. That alone would've swung their contest earlier in the season against the Jacksonville Jaguars.
Baltimore is fortunate to be 6-5 -- with a -1.92 nERD rating (our measurement of how many points a team would be expected to win by against an average one on a neutral field), they're analytically the 24th-best team in football. And without Justin Tucker, they'd surely be even worse than that.