Now that the NFL Draft is over, we've got a pretty good understanding of what teams are going to look like in 2017.

Except for the Jets. What the hell are the Jets doing?

But with the end of the draft came the start of over-under win total talk. Yesterday, oddsmakers at South Point Casino published team win totals for the upcoming NFL season. And some of the over-unders have us at numberFire scratching our heads.

As some of you know, we use a metric here called nERD, which tells us the number of points we'd expect a team to win by against an average one on a neutral field. A nERD of, say, 3.02 means we'd expect that team to beat an average team by a little over a field goal. One that's -8.04 is, well, not good.

Teams change a lot over an offseason, and that'll alter win totals from one year to the next. But the disparity in team record year over year can also be due to dumb luck. Like how the Chargers only won five games last year

If you're looking to utilize this data in some way, here's how I'd do it: take a look at the nERD ratings from last season, and ask yourself if that team will be better or worse in 2017. Then, peep and see if the win totals match that feeling.

The Jets, for example, had the fourth-worst nERD in football and currently have one of the most depleted offensive rosters we've seen in a long time. The fact that they have a 5.5-win over/under -- one that's similar to Jacksonville, a team that improved the defense even further this offseason -- is kind of shocking.

For a quick reference -- and without factoring in offseason moves, which is important -- teams who appear to have too low of win totals include New England (11), Atlanta (10), Arizona (7.5), and Buffalo (6).

Teams with totals that look too high include the Steelers (10.5), Raiders (9.5), Ravens (9.5), and Titans (9.5). (Granted, Tennessee's nERD includes games without Marcus Mariota.)

Is it September yet?